news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ottawa approves $15B Chinese takeover of Nexen

Canadian Content
20701news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ottawa approves $15B Chinese takeover of Nexen | CTV News


Political | 207010 hits | Dec 07 2:19 pm | Posted by: Robair
28 Comment

The federal government has approved the $15.1-billion takeover of Calgary-based Nexen Inc. by a state-owned Chinese enterprise.

Comments

  1. by avatar saturn_656
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:39 am
    Harper gave the green light Friday to the controversial $15.1-billion takeover of Calgary-based Nexen Inc. by the China National Offshore Oil Company.


    And all Canada got in return was two stupid Panda Bears.

  2. by avatar martin14
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:29 am
    *sigh*.. this is a mistake, plain and simple.

  3. by Canadian_Mind
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:43 am
    ugg...

  4. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:51 am
    "saturn_656" said
    Harper gave the green light Friday to the controversial $15.1-billion takeover of Calgary-based Nexen Inc. by the China National Offshore Oil Company.


    And all Canada got in return was two stupid Panda Bears.


    On lease.

  5. by avatar Yogi
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:17 am
    From Alberta... WITH LOVE!.jpg

  6. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:58 am
    So is the problem that it's a foreign "takeover" or that it's a takeover by a foreign national?

  7. by avatar martin14
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:42 am
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    So is the problem that it's a foreign "takeover" or that it's a takeover by a foreign national?


    Both.

    Foreign takeovers hsould be very limited, and by foreign state companies.. never.

  8. by avatar uwish
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:14 am
    why is this a mistake? did you know that over 80% of Nexen's assets are NOT in Canada anyway? plus the agreement was conditional to not moving headquarters etc.

  9. by avatar martin14
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:13 pm
    "uwish" said
    why is this a mistake? did you know that over 80% of Nexen's assets are NOT in Canada anyway? plus the agreement was conditional to not moving headquarters etc.



    These are our resources. They should not be handed over lock, stock and barrel.

    IMO, all oil production should be run by Canadian companies, foreigners
    can invest, but not control more than 51% of the company,
    and sales to foreign State run companies should be out.

    I understand my ideas are probably 20 years out of date, but I have seen
    what has been done in Eastern Europe, and it isn't pretty to watch what little
    sovereignty these countries had has been seriously stripped away.

    We might as well stop hiding and ask the Chinese gov't to open their
    Ministry office in Calgary, they can put a loudspeaker on the building
    and broadcast their propaganda.
    It's the same thing, and at least people will see what's really going on.


    You supported the Wheat Board to protect Canadian farmers, but are happy
    to let our oil walk right out the door ?

  10. by Anonymous
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:18 pm
    "uwish" said
    why is this a mistake? did you know that over 80% of Nexen's assets are NOT in Canada anyway? plus the agreement was conditional to not moving headquarters etc.


    Exactly, people are getting ther assholes bunged up over nothing. This is merely an open door for cash flow. Foreign companies still have to adhere to the rules of the country.

  11. by Anonymous
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:19 pm
    "Yogi" said
    From Alberta... WITH LOVE!.jpg


    Speak for yourself. What are you going to do ?Vote NDP in the next election.

  12. by avatar BeaverFever
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:34 pm
    Two things:

    1) Did anyonr REALLY think a Conservative from Alberta waw going to swoop in and put the kybosh on a "done deal" that made some Alberta oil execs and thr Alberta business lobby extremely rich? Sure he put an limit on future deals with state-owned corporations (but notice he left a window open for it under "special circumstances" which is not defined) but since the China and Malaysia deals were already inked and the Alberta oil barons had already counted it as money in their pocket, did anyone really think Harper was foing to snatch food out of their mouths just as they were getting ready to swallow?

    2) For the flag-waivers out there, it should be noted that 71 per cent of all companies operating in the Fort Mac oilsands area are not Canadian. Of the remaining companies that are headquartered in Canada, many are largely foreign-owned.

  13. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:56 pm
    IKs this the one where they want to ship in the Chinese workers? Or was that a coal mine? Can't recall. That is the part I find a little more dire. A foriegn-owned mine run by foreign workers.

    Harper--actually any political party--is in a tough spot with this one. You can't claim to be a free trade country and say no to fireign invenstment. And recall that Harper has already said no to a couple of big potential foriegn takeovers--that potash interest in Saskatechewan, landing rights for Air Emirates.

    One of the problmes with China is that they aren;t really playing in the free market, as a planned economy. Thye will pay more than market rates to acheive their political interests. Combine it with this free trade deal they have in the works with China that allows China to sue of they feel our environemtnal and labour laws are affecting their business, and it's a bit worriesone (mind you, under NAFTA and WTO, we already put those clauses in as well--recall the issue with gasoline additive MMT and Canada getting sued by Ethylcorp for example.

  14. by Anonymous
    Sat Dec 08, 2012 3:10 pm
    That was a BC coal mine (Canadian company) that brought it the Chinese workers.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net