 Aboriginal sentences reduced over �shameful� lack of background reportsLaw & Order | 207763 hits | May 17 9:07 pm | Posted by: Hyack  Judges enraged by inadequate access to native sentencing services despite an edict from the Supreme Court of Canada requiring it have been reducing prison terms for serious aboriginal offenders in response, recent court decisions reveal. And as courts strCommentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
but the public gets to pay for it by turning criminals out early, and especially early just because they are Native... just brilliant.
This is how you define racism, brought to you from our own judicial system.
Cops bad, criminals good.
Says who?
Sooooo because the judges are having a hissy fit, they find it necessary to put the public at risk. Yep, that'll teach us...wait, why is this the public's fault again?
Cops bad, criminals good.
Says who?
The media, judges, the OIPRD. Take your pick.
Cops bad, criminals good.
Says who?
Our political leadership. Cops in the G20 are nailed and hard for their actions irrespective of any mitigating circumstances while natives are given the proverbial by irrespective of any aggravating circumstances.
Nor should it depend on who your ancestors were, yet here we are believing because a relative in your distant past may or may have not been screwed over that it somehow excuses you to commit rape.
Cops bad, criminals good.
Says who?
The media, judges, the OIPRD. Take your pick.
In this article, I see no one blame cops. Or say that criminals are good.
All that is said, is that a government department is messing up and that judges are fed up.
They still have to stick to giving the minimum sentence, so I don't necessarily see the difference with any other case, since imho, all judges do lately is give out minimum sentences. Again, my opinion.
Nor should it depend on who your ancestors were, yet here we are believing because a relative in your distant past may or may have not been screwed over that it somehow excuses you to commit rape.
Nor should it depend on who your ancestors were, yet here we are believing because a relative in your distant past may or may have not been screwed over that it somehow excuses you to commit rape.
And more absurdly, though not as heinous, an excuse to smuggle heroin into the country.
In this article, I see no one blame cops. Or say that criminals are good.
All that is said, is that a government department is messing up and that judges are fed up.
They still have to stick to giving the minimum sentence, so I don't necessarily see the difference with any other case, since imho, all judges do lately is give out minimum sentences. Again, my opinion.
The only tihng that's messed up is the Supreme Court has determined that one specific set of people gets extra-lenient sentencing guidelines.
That's pure, unadulterated bullshit right there!
In this article, I see no one blame cops. Or say that criminals are good.
All that is said, is that a government department is messing up and that judges are fed up.
They still have to stick to giving the minimum sentence, so I don't necessarily see the difference with any other case, since imho, all judges do lately is give out minimum sentences. Again, my opinion.
The only tihng that's messed up is the Supreme Court has determined that one specific set of people gets extra-lenient sentencing guidelines.
That's pure, unadulterated bullshit right there!
Yeah, but in this case, not their own sentencing circle. That's a bonus!