Doctors claim to have "functional cure" for HIV Thirty years ago from Sunday, the Centers for Disease Control issued the first report on the emerging AIDS epidemic. Now, after years of progress in holding back the disease, there is finally an apparent case of one successful cure.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
It looks like Aids will be controlled, and with the right funding, could end the way of Polio.
The new medicines will not "cure" aids from the afflicted, but will stop transmission of it to their partner or children.
Good work scientists and large pharma.
Stem Cells are proving to live up to the hype. We could be on edge of a new era of miracles never before seen.
Indeed, I sure hope that they find a way to tackle the monster called cancer next.
An affliction that will affect 1 in 3 Canadians in their lifetimes.
So far, after 60 years of pumping billions into research, there has been almost no progress.
But I digress.
Seems to me the most effective way to cure AIDS is not to do the things that expose you to it in the first place.
While we may be on the verge of a cure for AIDS we've already established that strictly monogamous and non-promiscuous people are at far less risk than people who sex down anything that moves.
Seems to me the most effective way to cure AIDS is not to do the things that expose you to it in the first place.
Such as children born to mothers who have aids? Gays?
Such as children born to mothers who have aids? Gays?
The mothers who contracted AIDS from drug use or from unprotected promiscuous sex are making a decision of their own and their children suffer for it. I feel bad for the kids especially because their suffering is a result of someone else's selfish behavior.
As to the gays, homosexuality has nothing to do with AIDS.
Promiscuity does.
Monogamous homosexuals are at no more risk for AIDS than monogamous Mormon couples.
Such as children born to mothers who have aids? Gays?
The mothers who contracted AIDS from drug use or from unprotected promiscuous sex are making a decision of their own and their children suffer for it. I feel bad for the kids especially because their suffering is a result of someone else's selfish behavior.
As to the gays, homosexuality has nothing to do with AIDS.
Promiscuity does.
Monogamous homosexuals are at no more risk for AIDS than monogamous Mormon couples.
I have a guy cousin who must be in his early 60s now.
As much as I know, he's always had the same partner... and he's AIDS free.
Such as children born to mothers who have aids? Gays?
The mothers who contracted AIDS from drug use or from unprotected promiscuous sex are making a decision of their own and their children suffer for it. I feel bad for the kids especially because their suffering is a result of someone else's selfish behavior.
As to the gays, homosexuality has nothing to do with AIDS.
Promiscuity does.
Monogamous homosexuals are at no more risk for AIDS than monogamous Mormon couples.