Separate but unequal: Charts show growing rich-poor gap The Great Recession and the slump that followed have triggered a jobs crisis that's been making headlines since before President Obama was in office, and that will likely be with us for years. But the American economy is also plagued by a less-noted, but Commentsview comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
Who voted on this?
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
As you of course know, once all those people become qualified for the "good jobs," those jobs won't be good anymore because the reaganomics system * deliberately * defines "good" jobs as those that require * scarce * talent. The game is rigged, my friends.
No it's not. Proc will explain to you why it to work that way. It's a good thing.
As you of course know, once all those people become qualified for the "good jobs," those jobs won't be good anymore because the reaganomics system * deliberately * defines "good" jobs as those that require * scarce * talent. The game is rigged, my friends.
Which is why the lesser jobs ($12,15/hr) require a uni-education already.
I you think it's going to go away, you're seriously deluding yourself. Exactly what degree of income inequality do you think is right? India's?
Income inequality is irrelevant. Equality of opportunity is what matters.
As you of course know, once all those people become qualified for the "good jobs," those jobs won't be good anymore because the reaganomics system * deliberately * defines "good" jobs as those that require * scarce * talent. The game is rigged, my friends.
No it's not. Proc will explain to you why it to work that way. It's a good thing.
I never said it was a good or a bad thing. I said the rich-poor gap doesn't matter...
But, really, instead of starting a thread of that very same subject every week, why don't start only ONE in the debaters category and write everything in that thread ? It's an eternal re-beginning.
I you think it's going to go away, you're seriously deluding yourself. Exactly what degree of income inequality do you think is right? India's?
Income inequality is irrelevant. Equality of opportunity is what matters.
And it's illusory. Even sidestepping the question of whether or not minorities have the same opportinities as white males, either it means that 99% of the population are shiftless fucking layabouts who can't be arsed to do anything to better themselves and only 1% give a rat's, or that there's something other than effort at play.
The usual delusion. Do poor people really have equality of opportunity? Does the average middle class family compared to the people who run the country and Wall street? Do you?
Tons of people who were very poor when they were young are now millionaires. It's IRRELEVANT. What's relevant is an easy entry to the market, less regulations that favor the corrupts and less bureaucracy.
Anyway, no matter what we say to show you the truth, you will still believe in what you made out in your mind. So that's also irrelevant to argue
Tons of people who were very poor when they were young are now millionaires. It's IRRELEVANT. What's relevant is an easy entry to the market, less regulations that favor the corrupts and less bureaucracy.
Anyway, no matter what we say to show you the truth, you will still believe in what you made out in your mind. So that's also irrelevant to argue
Indeed. Just so long as the leftists appreciate that they'll get shot if they ever try to implement their Utopian fantasies then things will be fine.
Do poor people really have equality of opportunity?
Prove otherwise.
Ecclesiastes 9:11