news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

F-35 buy could trigger Arctic arms race: expert

Canadian Content
20785news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

F-35 buy could trigger Arctic arms race: expert


World | 207853 hits | Oct 29 10:44 pm | Posted by: Hyack
15 Comment

A government purchase of F-35 fighter jets could cause "angst in Russia" and trigger an Arctic arms race, Arctic sovereignty expert Michael Byers said Thursday.

Comments

  1. by avatar Bacardi4206
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:31 am
    I doubt 65 J-35's will start a artic arms race with Russia. That buy would be like Canada's largest military purchase in a long time. In which another won't be seen for probally another couple years. I mean this is Canada we are talking about. You don't go from what Canada's military use to be to a competiting military with Russia in a couple years thanks to 65 new jets purchases. That would bankrupt Canada all that military spending.

    Russia probally has like 10x that many jets alone near the artic side of russia. Let alone all the ones they actually own entirely, not including bombers, AA weapons, etc. There is no competiting with Russia, if Russia actually tries to get into a arms race with Canada by buying more military gear all because Canada bought some new jets. I'd seriously wonder about Russia's ego and sanity.

  2. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:49 am
    Michael Byers is with Rideau Institute which is a left-wing, anti-military and union funded 'think tank'.

  3. by avatar Unsound
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:09 pm
    Lmao! What a silly idea. The main competitors in the north would be us, USA, Russia, and Denmark. Denmark would lose an arms race even worse than we would and their voters wouldn't stand for it anyways. WE couldn't compete without going broke. Which leaves USA and Russia. Russia could compete with us but not with USA, they wouldn't admit it but they'd go broke too. Or broker, as the case may be.

    Sovreignty in the north will be establilshed by treaty, scientific research, and PR. Planes are just window dressing.

  4. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:25 pm
    "Unsound" said
    Lmao! What a silly idea. The main competitors in the north would be us, USA, Russia, and Denmark. Denmark would lose an arms race even worse than we would and their voters wouldn't stand for it anyways. WE couldn't compete without going broke. Which leaves USA and Russia. Russia could compete with us but not with USA, they wouldn't admit it but they'd go broke too. Or broker, as the case may be.

    Sovreignty in the north will be establilshed by treaty, scientific research, and PR. Planes are just window dressing.


    True, Treaties and laws will be passed, but the Russians respect force and stregnth. You don't need to be able to defeat Russia. You just need enough capaility to give it a bloody nose and knock out a few teeth to get them to reason. Once that is done the Russians will listen to reason.

  5. by avatar Unsound
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:34 pm
    I agree about the Russians, but that's where the window dressing comes in. They know, and we know that there's no way we could keep up but this shows that we're serious about putting up a front atleast. And fronting is as integral a part of international diplomacy as drunk driving diplomats and scandalous office parties.

  6. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:47 pm
    If we upgraded the WW2 Lee Enfield rifles the Canadian Rangers have or buy them an extra ski-doo the Rideau Institute 'experts' would class that as an Arctic arms race.

  7. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:02 pm
    "EyeBrock" said
    If we upgraded the WW2 Lee Enfield rifles the Canadian Rangers have or buy them an extra ski-doo the Rideau Institute 'experts' would class that as an Arctic arms race.

    Oh hell, 3 ppl planning a hunting trip up there would be considered an arms race by those dimwits.

  8. by Bruce_the_vii
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:40 pm
    "EyeBrock" said
    Michael Byers is with Rideau Institute which is a left-wing, anti-military and union funded 'think tank'.


    On my other political board they call them "stink tanks".

  9. by avatar PimpBrewski123
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:48 pm
    Ok, let's invade Russia.

    Next, the world !! :lol:

  10. by avatar RUEZ
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:53 pm
    I think this expert needs to hang up his credentials.

  11. by avatar saturn_656
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:56 pm
    Sounds like they are running out of arguments against the '35 purchase.

  12. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:08 pm
    Perhaps we could send this 'expert' up the Arctic Circle with some sticks and rocks. That should better any Russian forces than the F-35s.

    -J.

  13. by avatar EyeBrock
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:26 pm
    "CDN_PATRIOT" said
    Perhaps we could send this 'expert' up the Arctic Circle with some sticks and rocks. That should better any Russian forces than the F-35s.

    -J.



    Can we actually do that to Byers CP?

    Nope.

    Why post it then? It's a tad silly to say this kind of stuff when nobody can actually do it.

    A more realistic option to the media using these clueless plonkers is to e-mail the media orgs that give them a podium.

    Leave the "we could send this 'expert' up the Arctic Circle with some sticks and rocks..." out though eh?

  14. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:34 pm
    "EyeBrock" said

    A more realistic option to the media using these clueless plonkers is to e-mail the media orgs that give them a podium.


    I had figured that course of action would fall on deaf ears, so to speak. I'm guessing the media orgs won't give a crap what we think, short of a massive public outcry of somesort.

    -J.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net