news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Ignatieff unveils $1-billion homecare plan

Canadian Content
20665news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Ignatieff unveils $1-billion homecare plan


Political | 206651 hits | Oct 05 5:19 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl
10 Comment

Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff is pledging $1 billion to help Canadians care for sick or elderly relatives, a key part of his party's election platform.

Comments

  1. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:22 am
    BAHAHA Here is that nanny state Zip has been talking about ROTFL

  2. by avatar martin14
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:23 am
    spend baby spend.

    At least the lefties are proud to show it.

  3. by Bruce_the_vii
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:51 am
    The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

    The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

    He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.

  4. by avatar hurley_108
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:55 pm
    "Bruce_the_vii" said
    The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

    The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

    He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.


    We can pay for 9 years of this if we toss Harper's prison building spree.

  5. by Lemmy
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:27 pm
    "Bruce_the_vii" said
    The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

    The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

    He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.


    The national debt hasn't come from "social programs". We have lots of money to fund our social programs. The debt comes from public funding of waste and bureaucracy. We could have conquered that in the 90s but made irresponsible use of our budget surpluses. Our most recent additions to debt aren't from funding social programs either, but from ill-advised bailout-stimulus spending.

  6. by Bruce_the_vii
    Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:30 pm
    Another way of wording the budget and deficit is the "government's load". That includes social programs. In any case the world around governments have over spent - failed to carry their responsibilities.

  7. by ASLplease
    Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:27 am
    seems like a reasonable debate between the libs and cons, ie tax cuts vs social spending. I will watch it for a while to see which way makes most sense.

  8. by avatar hurley_108
    Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:16 am
    "ASLplease" said
    seems like a reasonable debate between the libs and cons, ie tax cuts vs social spending. I will watch it for a while to see which way makes most sense.


    Yea, because the Conservatives haven't spent a dime. :roll:

    More like crime and punishment spending (with emphasis on the punishment) versus social spending. Appeals to fear versus appeals to better nature and compassion.

  9. by Bruce_the_vii
    Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:56 am
    Yeah, they both believe in more spending despite the deficit. The prison purchase could have been put off, they will now cost twice as much because of the interest charges on the borrowing. This guy Harper needs some better ideas to run with.


    I saw an American economists on TV explain the ins and outs of deficit funding one day. He said deficits were basically good because they kept the politicians from more spending even more. This turns out to be a pretty smart philosophical answer.

  10. by avatar herbie
    Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:52 pm
    Announced same day as Harper announces $155 million prison expansion plan. And what's the response?
    Waaaahhhh!!!! Nanny-state blah blah blah. We'd rather have Uncle Jackboot state!



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net