news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Shots fired at early morning intruders

Canadian Content
20758news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Shots fired at early morning intruders


Law & Order | 207572 hits | May 27 12:16 pm | Posted by: Alta_redneck
204 Comment

For the second time in less than 15 months, a Central Albertan is accused of taking the law into his own hands revolving around a suspected quad thief.

Comments

  1. by avatar tritium
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:23 pm
    Fuck'in "A" - and got the fucker in the leg, right on.. We need the same gun laws as they have in the USA.

    But until then, shoot to kill, then bury the body. :twisted:

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:31 pm
    Even in liberal California this would've been perfectly legal and the only person facing charges would be the thief. One of these days someone with some sense is going to fix your laws.

  3. by avatar andyt
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:32 pm
    Police charged Gerry Edward Franklin Bigchild, 19, of the Sunchild reserve with possession of a weapon for the purpose of committing an offence, careless use of a firearm, use of a firearm while committing an indictable offence, and aggravated assault. On Wednesday, he appeared in Rocky provincial court and got bail.


    Yep, that's it, throw a bunch of charges at the guy defending his property, no mention of what the thief is charged with. I don't want American carry laws in this country, but somebody defending their home is a whole different story.

  4. by avatar tritium
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:37 pm
    "andyt" said
    Yep, that's it, throw a bunch of charges at the guy defending his property, no mention of what the thief is charged with. I don't want American carry laws in this country, but somebody defending their home is a whole different story.


    Yeah, the property owner defending his home will "probably" have some jail time...

    While the theif will get, probabtion, sue the home owner and of course get rehabilitated back into society to steal or worse to another victim.

    Justice system in Canada seriously sucks.

    (Something we can agree on Bart, but Texas gun laws rule.) :lol:

  5. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:40 pm
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.

  6. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:44 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.


    He was defending his property on his property. Sucks he is getting charged

  7. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:51 pm
    "KorbenDeck" said
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.


    He was defending his property on his property. Sucks he is getting charged
    He's getting charged for careless use of a firearm for one. He didn't take deliberate aim and shoot one of the fuckers, he unloaded in the direction they took off in. They hadn't even managed to steal anything there ffs :idea:

    And these are the kind of gun owners that people cheerlead?
    I have no issues with self-defense, but being willing to shoot and potentially kill someone trying to steal "stuff" is almost incomprehensible to me. And to just blaze away in the "general direction" is TOTALLY indefensible!

    And actually, he wasn't defending ANYTHING! They tried left empty handed BEFORE the gun was even drawn.

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:52 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.


    Here you are defending the civil rights of a criminal.
    Spare me, please.

  9. by avatar Heavy_Metal
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:52 pm
    you are not to take the law into your own hands! if you want to shoot something, use a camera, fly out with a camera take pictures of the scumbags and give the pics to the police, when the hell will people learn, we have police for a reason.

  10. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:56 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.


    Here you are defending the civil rights of a criminal.
    Spare me, please.
    Civil rights of a criminal? Are you slow in the head? Yeah, and what IF someone not even involved in any of this had been in the line of fire and got hit? You'd still be cheerleading this 19 yr old fucktard?
    And I'll repeat, they tried to flee empty handed BEFORE THE GUN WAS EVEN DRAWN!!!

  11. by avatar andyt
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:57 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said
    He wasn't defending his home...he was defending a fucking quad or its gas. He exited his home then decided to "shoot in the direction" of the would be thieves.
    Spare me, please.


    He was defending his property on his property. Sucks he is getting charged
    He's getting charged for careless use of a firearm for one. He didn't take deliberate aim and shoot one of the fuckers, he unloaded in the direction they took off in. They hadn't even managed to steal anything there ffs :idea:

    And these are the kind of gun owners that people cheerlead?
    I have no issues with self-defense, but being willing to shoot and potentially kill someone trying to steal "stuff" is almost incomprehensible to me. And to just blaze away in the "general direction" is TOTALLY indefensible!

    And actually, he wasn't defending ANYTHING! They tried left empty handed BEFORE the gun was even drawn.

    Yeah, you've got a point - the dick heads didn't even steal anything. But I get so tired of these pukes.

  12. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu May 27, 2010 7:59 pm
    "Heavy_Metal" said
    you are not to take the law into your own hands! if you want to shoot something, use a camera, fly out with a camera take pictures of the scumbags and give the pics to the police, when the hell will people learn, we have police for a reason.


    Your courts and ours have ruled that the police are not there to protect anyone or their property. They maintain order. Period.

    So down here most states' laws recognize this point of jurisprudence and don't bother fettering people with silly rules when they have to defend themselves or their property. Because the legal expectation is that you are your own first responder.

    But for some reason you and people like you are possessed of the bizarre notion that something magical happens to people who put on a badge and that they become uniquely qualified to protect everyone everywhere and that only they can be the High Priests of The Law.

    And that's a fine attitude to have for a people who need to be .

  13. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Thu May 27, 2010 8:01 pm
    "andyt" said

    Yeah, you've got a point - the dick heads didn't even steal anything. But I get so tired of these pukes.


    Oh trust me andy, so do I! But this kid did SO many things wrong when he shot at them. Hell, even in the Old West you couldn't really shoot someone in the back, no matter how big an asshole they were.

  14. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu May 27, 2010 8:03 pm
    "PublicAnimalNo9" said

    Civil rights of a criminal? Are you slow in the head? Yeah, and what IF someone not even involved in any of this had been in the line of fire and got hit? You'd still be cheerleading this 19 yr old fucktard?
    And I'll repeat, they tried to flee empty handed BEFORE THE GUN WAS EVEN DRAWN!!!


    The only thing I have to recommend here is that the 19yo kid should spend some time at the range with a certified instructor and I'm also going to recommend the kid get himself a more accurate pistol with a little more stopping-power. I'm biased towards the .45ACP but I guess he could also go with a .454 Casull.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • tritium Thu May 27, 2010 11:26 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net