 Liberal MP remains in caucus after charge Montreal MP Pablo Rodriguez will remain a member of the Liberal Party caucus while he fights a charge of refusing to take a breathalyzer test following a car accident in April.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
Fu?ks! Once again thinking their above the law. My friend is a Police Officer in Ottawa and said that years ago, when ever they pull over an Politician or terrorist (oops)diplomat that they had to
contact the RCMP. I have to get into politics!
The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise
You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.
The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise
You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.
Absolutely.... screw the cons.
The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise
You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.
Absolutely.... screw the cons.
Well, at least you admit it.
Hypocrite...
He should get himself the same lawyer that Rahim Jaffer had.
Well, at least you admit it.
Hypocrite...
Would you expect anything less from Kenny?
The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise
He has already admitted that he failed to provide a sample, or in other words he "refused to blow".
Well, at least you admit it.
Hypocrite...
Would you expect anything less from Kenny?
Not a hope.
The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise
He has already admitted that he failed to provide a sample, or in other words he "refused to blow".
Not to nitpick, but "failing to provide" and "refusing to provide" are two different things. I would NEVER provide a breath sample, but I would never REFUSE to do so.
Cop: "I want you to blow in the tube"
Lemmy: "Sure thing"
Cop: "Okay, blow"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You need to blow now"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You're not blowing, you need to blow harder"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "If you don't blow, I'm going to charge you with refusing to provide a breath sample"
Lemmy: "I'm not refusing, I'm agreeing to blow. Give 'er to me, let's go"
Cop: "okay, blow"
Lemmy "okay"
etc, etc....
But seriously, the guy's entitled to a day in court before he's penalyzed. I'm pretty sure I've read that somewhere.
Not to nitpick, but "failing to provide" and "refusing to provide" are two different things. I would NEVER provide a breath sample, but I would never REFUSE to do so.
Cop: "I want you to blow in the tube"
Lemmy: "Sure thing"
Cop: "Okay, blow"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You need to blow now"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You're not blowing, you need to blow harder"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "If you don't blow, I'm going to charge you with refusing to provide a breath sample"
Lemmy: "I'm not refusing, I'm agreeing to blow. Give 'er to me, let's go"
Cop: "okay, blow"
Lemmy "okay"
etc, etc....
But seriously, the guy's entitled to a day in court before he's penalyzed. I'm pretty sure I've read that somewhere.
I use a Breath Alcohol Tester as part of my job. I know how much air it takes. I've tried to defeat the device in training using shallow blowing, etc.
If someone honestly can't muster enough air for one of these machines they should be under medical care on a ventilator.