Climate change human link evidence 'stronger'Environmental | 206933 hits | Mar 06 10:25 pm | Posted by: Hyack  A review from the UK Met Office says it is becoming clearer that human activities are causing climate change. It says the evidence is stronger now than when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change carried out its last assessment in 2007.Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 2 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Share
|
Mobile
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net
FLAIL.
Oh, you mean unlike the "credible" climate change deniers, who are actually the same scientists-for-hire who denied that smoking causes cancer and that acid rain exists?
So climate deniers believe in acid rain?
The goal posts of proof move weekly. Climate change is real enough and there is geological proof that it's happened before, often.
What is difficult to prove is that human activity is worse than say a volcanic eruption and which one of the two is causing the damage?
Humans are taking all the oil out of the ground, cause the Earth to shift!!!
ROTFL yip.... pretty soon human activity is going to be blamed for Earthquakes...
Already happens. Sadly.
Oh, you mean unlike the "credible" climate change deniers, who are actually the same scientists-for-hire who denied that smoking causes cancer and that acid rain exists?
I might as well ask for specific scientists? I mean, I'm not aware of all of the names for and against climate change, but if they're the same guys, there should be a record, no?
Maybe consistent, but how do any of those data prove human influence? Aren't they just consistent with an increase in global temperatures, whether human or nature caused?
They're connected to recent scandals, bad predictions, and other recent critique.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/156 ... r-computer
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weath ... -snow.html
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/25/m ... #more-9565
I suggest the Met Office needs global warming hysteria to justify it's mega-budget.
The study makes claims to look at recent studies, but ignores all the recent discoveries calling the hypothesis of catastrophe from human-caused warming into question. Those are too many to list here.
ROTFL yip.... pretty soon human activity is going to be blamed for Earthquakes...
Humans are taking all the oil out of the ground, cause the Earth to shift!!!
It has already been said a lot of times. Even on the 'neutral' Radio-Canada: we see more earthquakes, bigger in intensity, because the higher temperature helps to tectonic plates to slide on each others.
.... even tho the earthquakes are located dozens of km under sea level where the temperature is stable @ ~ 300C ...
Here we go again. Now we've gone from 'carbon emissions' or 'carbon footprint' to the much more vague, 'human activity'.
The goal posts of proof move weekly. Climate change is real enough and there is geological proof that it's happened before, often.
What is difficult to prove is that human activity is worse than say a volcanic eruption and which one of the two is causing the damage?
Holy Strawman!
Fail.
The proponents of this theory get caught fudging the figures and suppressing evidence, and they expect people to take them seriously?
FLAIL.
Some proponents. On both sides, I might add.