"Washington DC police can arrest a woman in any area they�ve declared prostitution free zone. And in a backasswards move to curb prostitution, carrying more than two condoms is considered proof of intention to prostitute." I wonder if this is just poor writing? Can they really arrest any woman in these zones? What about boys ie male prostitutes. What about any man in the area carrying more than 2 condoms - surely that indicates an intention to buy. Maybe just shoot any human in the area and have done with it.
Of course they can't. It will never hold up in court. It's not law either. It's funny, because the PDF file that the "two condom thing" links to, is a study and it states reasons for arrest. Having more than 2 condoms was not stated as one. On another note, the "prostition free zones" were there during the inauguration. It's kinda late to bs over this.
So does that mean if you're in posession of an errect penis, that would be considered proof of intention to hire a prostitute?
What a stupid law.
It's funny, because the PDF file that the "two condom thing" links to, is a study and it states reasons for arrest. Having more than 2 condoms was not stated as one. On another note, the "prostition free zones" were there during the inauguration. It's kinda late to bs over this.
How stupid can you be?
my question is what are these lawmakers drinking?
Isn't there a law against legislating while intoxicated?
not surprising since this the U.S.A the most backward and dysfunctional of the developed world
Chuck you, Farley.
not surprising since this the U.S.A the most backward and dysfunctional of the developed world
Chuck you, Farley.
Haha Zing!
And agreed.