news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

The Decade when the face of Canada changed

Canadian Content
20828news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

The Decade when the face of Canada changed


Misc CDN | 208269 hits | Dec 29 12:55 am | Posted by: Hyack
63 Comment

When a Canadian is concerned about his own way of living, this concern is not racism. �David Lam, former lieutenant-governor of British Columbia.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:22 pm
    cant say anything, I'll be called a racist.

    So, who gives a shit what I get called.

    The author is 100% right, and severe steps need to be taken, right away.

  2. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:14 pm
    Well, at some point immigration became a right and not a privalege. The question is how do we reverse that?

  3. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:24 pm
    "martin14" said
    cant say anything, I'll be called a racist.

    So, who gives a shit what I get called.

    The author is 100% right, and severe steps need to be taken, right away.


    Nothing indicates that anything will happen until we get some great example of immigrant sponsored terrorism or something similar. Then, unfortunately, we may see some kind of knee jerk extreme reaction that will be no better than the current status quo. Neither side is prepared for honest dislogue at this time, so we will continue to suffer from our current policies.

  4. by ridenrain
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:45 pm
    Good article. I'll have to look out for that book now.
    The glaring comment: "The white race is the cancer of human history." sounds like it could have been the motto for the Copenhagen non-treaty.

  5. by avatar EyeBrock
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:06 pm
    Not a bad article. Nothing will change though. Our government(s), our leaders are too scared to even debate any of this stuff.

    The pro-immigration lobby has way too much power to challenge and anybody questioning any part of our broken immigration system is instantly shouted down as a 'racist' by the rabid lefties who seem to love that shit.

    We have whole sub-divisions in the GTA that are tweely called 'ethnic-enlaves' by the same people who are too scared to say 'Christmas' anymore.

    These 'ethnic enclaves' are nothing more than voluntary apartheid within Canada. We have whole 'communities' that refuse to integrate.

    They are here to reap the benefits and give nothing back.

    That is the harsh reality of 'Hotel Canada'.

  6. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:26 pm
    Canada is being colonized.

  7. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:11 pm
    The argument that this is something new is false.

    There are plenty of older immigrant groups (like the Polish and Ukrainians in the Edmonton area for example) that also pretty much refused to assimilate. Same goes for some Chinese immigrants in almost any one of our major cities. Then there are religious groups like the Jewish and Mennonite who also refused to assimilate.

    The problem with immigration IMHO isn't that there's too much of it, but rather that we allow them to all settle wherever they want, which usually means Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal.

    What should be done is that, as a condition of immigration, new immigrants should be placed in cities other than the big three and spread out across the country until they get their citizenship (which is at least 3 years). After they have their citizenship, then they can live wherever they want. My guess is that after 3-5 years, most of them will have set down roots and lives and won't want to move.

    That would allow other cities in this country to reap the benefits of immigration and ease the issues the three biggest cities face because of it. Frankly, we've got a big, empty country and we have room for lots of people, as long as they're willing to live across this country, not just in Toronto or Vancouver.

  8. by avatar Public_Domain
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:11 pm
    :|

  9. by avatar Akhenaten
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:18 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    There are plenty of older immigrant groups (like the Polish and Ukrainians in the Edmonton area for example) that also pretty much refused to assimilate. Same goes for some Chinese immigrants in almost any one of our major cities. Then there are religious groups like the Jewish and Mennonite who also refused to assimilate.


    There's a difference between 'refusing to assimilate', (although i would argue that there are huge holes in that statement considering they assimilated now), and calling Canada a filthy nation and then planning to bomb several crowded areas of it.

    I don't quite recall Ukrainians or Polish (or any others: German, Dutch) doing anything remotely similar even during the darkest days of bigotry leveled against them. Refusing to notice the difference there frankly is an insult to all other immigrants past or future who never dreamed of causing such pain and destruction.

  10. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:48 pm
    "Akhenaten" said
    There are plenty of older immigrant groups (like the Polish and Ukrainians in the Edmonton area for example) that also pretty much refused to assimilate. Same goes for some Chinese immigrants in almost any one of our major cities. Then there are religious groups like the Jewish and Mennonite who also refused to assimilate.


    There's a difference between 'refusing to assimilate', (although i would argue that there are huge holes in that statement considering they assimilated now), and calling Canada a filthy nation and then planning to bomb several crowded areas of it.

    I don't quite recall Ukrainians or Polish (or any others: German, Dutch) doing anything remotely similar even during the darkest days of bigotry leveled against them. Refusing to notice the difference there frankly is an insult to all other immigrants past or future who never dreamed of causing such pain and destruction.

    Pot meet kettle...

    That's really funny Ak, seeing as how you did the exact same thing yourself. You just lumped in ALL immigrants as wanting to blow up Canada, but I've yet to hear recent Chinese immigrants say they want to "bomb several crowded parts" of Canada, or Thais, or Brazilians, etc. Not everyone who comes to Canada hates it, just a small minority.

    I wouldn't call a Polish lady who has lived in Canada for four decades who refuses to learn English, goes to a Polish doctor/lawyer/pharmacist/etc and only talks to other Polish people assimilated. Same goes for an ex-GFs parents who lived in Canada since the 70s and still do not speak English, eat anything remotely 'Canadian' (just rice, veggies and meat 3 times a day), and spend every waking moment in Chinatown assimilated. That's merely two examples I personally know of, I'm sure there are plenty of others just like them.

    Conversely, I know several people from Afghanistan who speak fluent English, play hockey, eat bacon, smoke, drink like Canucks. Are they assimilated? I'd argue that they're closer to being Canucks than the other two examples I mentioned.

  11. by avatar martin14
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:56 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    The argument that this is something new is false.

    There are plenty of older immigrant groups (like the Polish and Ukrainians in the Edmonton area for example) that also pretty much refused to assimilate. Same goes for some Chinese immigrants in almost any one of our major cities. Then there are religious groups like the Jewish and Mennonite who also refused to assimilate.

    The problem with immigration IMHO isn't that there's too much of it, but rather that we allow them to all settle wherever they want, which usually means Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal.

    What should be done is that, as a condition of immigration, new immigrants should be placed in cities other than the big three and spread out across the country until they get their citizenship (which is at least 3 years). After they have their citizenship, then they can live wherever they want. My guess is that after 3-5 years, most of them will have set down roots and lives and won't want to move.

    That would allow other cities in this country to reap the benefits of immigration and ease the issues the three biggest cities face because of it. Frankly, we've got a big, empty country and we have room for lots of people, as long as they're willing to live across this country, not just in Toronto or Vancouver.



    hmm, illegal, unconstitutional, impossible to enforce.

    Slovakia has ID cards with everyone's 'permanent address' on it.
    Doesn't stop anyone from moving around and living where they want.

  12. by avatar Akhenaten
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:58 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    There are plenty of older immigrant groups (like the Polish and Ukrainians in the Edmonton area for example) that also pretty much refused to assimilate. Same goes for some Chinese immigrants in almost any one of our major cities. Then there are religious groups like the Jewish and Mennonite who also refused to assimilate.


    There's a difference between 'refusing to assimilate', (although i would argue that there are huge holes in that statement considering they assimilated now), and calling Canada a filthy nation and then planning to bomb several crowded areas of it.

    I don't quite recall Ukrainians or Polish (or any others: German, Dutch) doing anything remotely similar even during the darkest days of bigotry leveled against them. Refusing to notice the difference there frankly is an insult to all other immigrants past or future who never dreamed of causing such pain and destruction.

    Pot meet kettle...

    That's really funny Ak, seeing as how you did the exact same thing yourself. You just lumped in ALL immigrants as wanting to blow up Canada, but I've yet to hear recent Chinese immigrants say they want to "bomb several crowded parts" of Canada, or Thais, or Brazilians, etc. Not everyone who comes to Canada hates it, just a small minority.


    Um, no I didn't, not even close. I guess you can't read.
    I did NOT lump all immigrants as wanting to blow up Canada, I did EXACTLY the opposite. I pointed out how we never really had to ask ourselves any tough questions about immigration UNTIL certain immigrants tried blowing us up. I really don't understand where you get this idea I'm accusing ALL immigrants of that. I think it's blatantly obvious I pointed out that Ukrainians and Polish (among many others) never ever contemplated that even during the darkest times of bigotry leveled against them. Your reading comprehension is so poor I've just had to reprint what I said for you.

    I mean wow. If you can't read my posts then please don't respond to them. It's like I said 2+2=4 and you reply "Pi has nothing to do with this.".

    but I've yet to hear recent Chinese immigrants say they want to "bomb several crowded parts" of Canada, or Thais, or Brazilians, etc. Not everyone who comes to Canada hates it, just a small minority.


    Excuse me but that's my point. Answer the question; small minority 'hates Canada' enough to blow some of us up? Ukrainians? Thais? Brazilians? No. answer the question if you have the guts....

    Then go back and reread what I said because there is NO CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK and NO LUMPING ALL IMMIGRANTS AS WANTING TO BLOW UP CANADA. I'm sorry but that 'understanding' of my post can only mean you didn't read properly.

    My advice to you is to get over whatever personal problem it is you have with me and calmly, correctly read my post instead of reading it and obviously getting the 180-degree opposite understanding of what I said.


    On to the rest of your post that makes no sense:
    I wouldn't call a Polish lady who has lived in Canada for four decades who refuses to learn English, goes to a Polish doctor/lawyer/pharmacist/etc and only talks to other Polish people assimilated. Same goes for an ex-GFs parents who lived in Canada since the 70s and still do not speak English, eat anything remotely 'Canadian' (just rice, veggies and meat 3 times a day), and spend every waking moment in Chinatown assimilated. That's merely two examples I personally know of, I'm sure there are plenty of others just like them.


    Um, bullshit. There I said it. I live in Alberta and it's been forever since I've met a Ukrainian or Polish person who doesn't speak English. They have kept many parts of their heritage and bully for them but not speaking English? Very few and far between, sorry. The fact of the matter is they live WITH Canada and not against it. The other fact of the matter is about a couple million or more Ukrainians and Polish immigrated to the West and out of those maybe a few hundred 'refuse' to speak English? That's assimilation no matter how offended by the word you are. Get over the word 'assimilate'. It's not an evil word just because loser rebels-without-a-cause or Skinny puppy don't like the word. We can pick a 'nicer' one if you like but it'll mean the same thing.

  13. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:05 pm
    "Mr_Canada" said
    I won't say racist.

    But you are all certianly xenophobic.


    What do you say, then, about Mexico that does not allow immigration at all? They also prohibit the building of mosques and they do all of this openly and for the purpose of 'preserving Mexican culture'.

    Edit: Japan also has highly restrictive immigration polices that require immigrants to adopt Japanese names and to speak all seven formality levels of Japanese fluently. Again, this is done to preserve Japanese culture.

    Bigots, right?

  14. by avatar Akhenaten
    Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:07 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    I won't say racist.

    But you are all certianly xenophobic.


    What do you say, then, about Mexico that does not allow immigration at all? They also prohibit the building of mosques and they do all of this openly and for the purpose of 'preserving Mexican culture'.
    Simple: Only English whities are racist.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3 4 5

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • martin14 Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:19 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net