news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

The 10-billion-barrel battle

Canadian Content
20685news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

The 10-billion-barrel battle


Business | 206853 hits | Nov 21 6:22 pm | Posted by: Hyack
15 Comment

The Calgary-based oil industry consultant is on a one-man campaign to lift the moratorium on offshore oil drilling on Canada�s West Coast.

Comments

  1. by ridenrain
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:30 am
    We need to proceed with this. This is a vital resorce that BC & Canada needs to develop.

  2. by Canadian_Mind
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:38 am
    save it for times when oil is more valueable.

  3. by ridenrain
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:41 am
    It takes years to set up these things and we should be ready.
    Why should we drill the east coast an dnot the west also?

  4. by avatar sandorski
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:53 am
    Another BC moratorium I wouldn't mind seeing end is the moratorium on Uranium Mining.

  5. by ridenrain
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:56 am
    Is there a legitimate market for more uranium?

  6. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:27 am
    Yes, proceed with this, we need more Canadian oil.

    I wish there was enough there that could supplu us. I'd rather deal with friends than the F wierdo nations.

  7. by avatar uwish
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:35 am
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    save it for times when oil is more valueable.


    no, it takes 5 to 8 years to bring a field into production in conventional reservoirs. Offshore it can take longer. The time is now.

  8. by avatar sandorski
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:55 am
    "ridenrain" said
    Is there a legitimate market for more uranium?


    I really don't know, but the Moratorium pretty much renders the question Moot.

  9. by ridenrain
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:00 am
    True. I'm definately pro-mining but there's no need if it's not economical. I honestly don't know if there is a market for more uranium. Maybe when nuclear power finally gets better established.

  10. by avatar KorbenDeck
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:21 am
    All of the First Nations representatives who took part also opposed lifting the ban
    .

    That's because they are still fighting in the courts for total rights of all offshore resources in B.C.

  11. by avatar CanadianJeff
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:38 am
    "ridenrain" said
    True. I'm definately pro-mining but there's no need if it's not economical. I honestly don't know if there is a market for more uranium. Maybe when nuclear power finally gets better established.


    A little off topic I know but don't you have any concerns with Nuclear power when it comes to the waste being around for tens of thousands of years that our kids will have to deal with?

    I know that was my largest concern with the reactor posed here in Saskatchewan.

    That and where Nuclear power has been used long term there may be problems but that reactors nowadays are built very differently from those in the past with more safety in mind. In other words the concerns of safety in my mind were addressed via better engineering.

  12. by avatar DrCaleb
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:35 am
    "CanadianJeff" said
    True. I'm definately pro-mining but there's no need if it's not economical. I honestly don't know if there is a market for more uranium. Maybe when nuclear power finally gets better established.


    A little off topic I know but don't you have any concerns with Nuclear power when it comes to the waste being around for tens of thousands of years that our kids will have to deal with?

    No, it doesn't have to. There are methods of re-processing the 'waste' back into usable fuel.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_breeder_reactor

    Japan has been doing this for decades. It's getting the tree huggers who say we need to end our dependence on Oil, but then protest the transport of nuclear waste, to see the light (while driving their cars to the protest).

  13. by Bruce_the_vii
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:47 am
    I calculate that over the life time of a Candu reactor the amount of fission products is 2.5 cubic meters, small.

  14. by Canadian_Mind
    Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:40 pm
    I think people are missing my point, should buy from the foreign fucked up countries now while oil prices are still relatively low, vs still having them as suppliers 50 years from now when they will have us by our throats at 1000 dollar a barrel oil.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net