news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Pause in army operations no longer needed: Top

Canadian Content
20679news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Pause in army operations no longer needed: Top soldier


Military | 206794 hits | Jul 22 9:12 pm | Posted by: Hyack
18 Comment

OTTAWA � The chief of the Canadian army said soldiers will likely not have to take an operational pause of one year or longer after all, once the mission in Afghanistan ends in July 2011.

Comments

  1. by ridenrain
    Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:34 am
    yeah army.

  2. by avatar PENATRATOR
    Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:22 pm
    Precursor to keep us in the "Stan past 2011

  3. by Choban
    Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:31 pm
    "PENATRATOR" said
    Precursor to keep us in the "Stan past 2011


    Probably true.

  4. by avatar Praxius
    Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:19 pm
    Sure there's the money going towards new equipment, LAV's and upgrading the current LAVs.... but there still going to be required a period of time to actually repair and upgrade the current vehicles in rotation. Or do they plan on doing all of this on the fly as they head to the next mission planned out?

  5. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:46 pm
    Just another Senior Officer spouting the Government line in order to secure a high paying position upon retirement.

    Nothing to see here folks, just move along please.

  6. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:42 am
    I guess those back channels from the white house are changing minds in Ottawa. :evil:

  7. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:46 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    Just another Senior Officer spouting the Government line in order to secure a high paying position upon retirement.

    Nothing to see here folks, just move along please.


    Andy McNaughtons grandson is no slouch and certainly isn't a pushover.

  8. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:47 am
    "Guy_Fawkes" said
    I guess those back channels from the white house are changing minds in Ottawa. :evil:


    It seems so mon ami.

  9. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:06 am
    Oh well, once more into the breech I suppose...

  10. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:22 am
    "SprCForr" said
    Just another Senior Officer spouting the Government line in order to secure a high paying position upon retirement.

    Nothing to see here folks, just move along please.


    Andy McNaughtons grandson is no slouch and certainly isn't a pushover.


    Whether the good General is or isn't a push over isn't the point here. The point is that as a public servant he is still required by law to carry out the will of the Government and if they tell him to state publicly that a pause isn't needed he's got two choices, whether he agrees with either or not. He can either resign or make that statement.

    We all know that policy isn't made by the Military, they simply react to it. So I suspect that General Leslie had those two options given to him and chose to take the Governments point of view for whatever reasons.

  11. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:13 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said

    Whether the good General is or isn't a push over isn't the point here.


    It's the point you're making isn't it? You're saying he's done it in the hopes of securing a high position. Just another toady if you like.

    The point is that as a public servant he is still required by law to carry out the will of the Government and if they tell him to state publicly that a pause isn't needed he's got two choices, whether he agrees with either or not. He can either resign or make that statement.


    Really think Leslie's merely a sock puppet? Check his cv and see if you still think he needs the approval of a politican to secure a good position. You do the man a serious injustice given his accomplishments.

    We all know that policy isn't made by the Military, they simply react to it. So I suspect that General Leslie had those two options given to him and chose to take the Governments point of view for whatever reasons.


    We all know that coffee shop prattle shouldn't be used to pass judgement on issues and on people. That the man may be stating fact doesn't fit your pre-concieved notion of his character, does it?

    It was a cheap drive-by smear.

  12. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:52 am
    FYI I was being sarcastic with my first post. I, not knowing General Leslie, have no idea's of his motivation for suddenly changing his opinion on the situation. But, maybe, in my old age I'm becomming far to sceptical.

    I fully understand how the system works and I suppose in hindsight I shouldn't have infered he was attempting to secure a good job upon retirement, I'm quite sure he's got his reasons for the abrupt change of heart.

    Either way, I did not intend to run a smear campaign against General Leslie personally, but I'd have no qualms about running one against the system that is NDHQ and it's political masters.

  13. by avatar SprCForr  Gold Member
    Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:13 am
    Fair enough.

    As you allude to, there certainly is a political element when one is a General in the CF, but in his case he's a straight shooter and been one since day one.

    If there ever was a picture needed to pin to the term "warrior-monk", it would be his.

  14. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:24 am
    "SprCForr" said
    Fair enough.

    As you allude to, there certainly is a political element when one is a General in the CF, but in his case he's a straight shooter and been one since day one.

    If there ever was a picture needed to pin to the term "warrior-monk", it would be his.


    After witnessing the excesses of certain Senior Officers in the military during my time in, it's nice to see someone who's more concerned with the military than with getting their ticket punched for personal gain.

    Although I am lothe to admit it, the Army seem to have more of these leaders than the other two services. :lol:



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net