news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Meet EI, stimulus conditions or face defeat, Ig

Canadian Content
20692news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Meet EI, stimulus conditions or face defeat, Ignatieff tells PM


Political | 206907 hits | Jun 15 8:14 am | Posted by: WDHIII
29 Comment

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff listed a series of conditions on Monday that he said Prime Minister Stephen Harper must meet to avoid the Liberals toppling the minority Conservative government and triggering a summer election.

Comments

  1. by avatar poquas
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:48 pm
    I�m slowly developing a whole new respect for this guy. Maybe not enough for my vote �yet, but he obviously thinks before he speaks.

  2. by stokes
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:31 pm
    If Iggy was the man with balls that he thinks he is, I dare him to vote down the government, lets see how far he gets with pissed off Canadians on the campaign trail...to be honest I think another minority government led by Iggy would be hammered so much more than Harper and would be worth the hours of entertainment it would bring!!!!

  3. by avatar RUEZ
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:35 pm
    I'd be curious to see how well the NDP and Bloc would work with an Iggy government.

  4. by avatar poquas
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:38 pm
    It has nothing to do with balls. :roll:

    This is an opposition leader doing EXACTLY what he's supposed to do. Oppose the governing party on behalf of the public.

    It's been years since that role was properly filled from either party.

    The partisans will find fault with whatever decision he makes. It seems that it�s either no guts or no glory. Maybe living up to the responsibility of the position is more important.

  5. by OnTheIce
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:53 pm
    "poquas" said
    It has nothing to do with balls. :roll:

    This is an opposition leader doing EXACTLY what he's supposed to do. Oppose the governing party on behalf of the public.

    It's been years since that role was properly filled from either party.

    The partisans will find fault with whatever decision he makes. It seems that it�s either no guts or no glory. Maybe living up to the responsibility of the position is more important.


    It does take balls to spend a week slamming the Government for incompetance due to the budget and deficit, then turn around and demand more spending through EI.

    I applaud him sticking to his guns, but the hypocrisy is outstanding.

  6. by avatar Canadaka
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:59 pm
    "RUEZ" said
    I'd be curious to see how well the NDP and Bloc would work with an Iggy government.


    I think they will work together much better than they work with the Conservatives and therefor be a more stable government. They are closer politically, A liberal government with a strong NDP presence in opposition has brought forth many positive things in Canada. Tommy Douglas medicare, The health care package in Paul Martins minority government come to mind.

    There would of course be partisan games from all sides, but it would be less than it has been. I don't see how it could be worse.

  7. by Canadian_Mind
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:08 pm
    * Provide more details about improving the employment insurance system before the House of Commons votes on budget estimates at the end of the week. The government has said it will introduce unspecified new EI proposals in the fall.


    Huh? I don't think the government can come up with a detailed and sustainable plan by friday, unless they already have soemthign in the works. :roll:


    * Give more information about the rate of stimulus spending than included in last Thursday's progress report.


    As I said in another thread, even just having project status listed in addition to what projects are recieving money would help in this area alot. Would give people an idea of whether a project has started or not, or how far along the construction process it is if it's already under construction. More specific details about the total budget of a project, rather than the scale currently used; < 100 000, 100 000 - 1 000 000, 1 000 000 - 5 000 000, > 5 000 000, in addition to the amount of money out of that budget already paid out towards the construction of a project.

    None of what I suggested above should be hard to implement at all, and would provide an incredible amount of transparency.

    * Show more details on the government's plan to contain the ballooning deficit, instead of offering what Ignatieff called "rosy projections."


    Government should already have a more detailed plan that they can provide upon request.

    * Provide clearer answers on the government's plan to deal with Canada's medical isotopes shortage.


    If there is a plan, they should be able to provide it by Friday. If there isn't a plan that can be provided by friday, then it shows the government's irresponsibility
    with regards to the issue.


    So 3 demands I agree with, one I don't (and frankly I don't know much about the issue anyways). Not a bad rep so far. I hope that if these issues are resolved that Iggy continues to act as a responsible opposition leader.

  8. by avatar RUEZ
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:11 pm
    I'll give iggy some credit for actually doing his job. Unlike the useless NDP and Bloc. He's not giving them a free ride, but he's also not making it impossible for them to work together. However I don't agree that EI needs to be changed. Investment and training would be far more valuable.

  9. by OnTheIce
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:15 pm
    To trigger a vote will put a dagger into our economy.

    Iggy is so concerned with getting the money out for "construction season" that an election call will delay spending until the end of 2009, missing this year entirely.

  10. by avatar Alta_redneck
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:27 pm
    Hey mt, I'll get this one for yeah. :lol:




  11. by avatar Bodah
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:22 pm
    Here's what's going to happen.

    The Liberals will lay down their demands and stick to it. The Conservatives knowing the Canadian electorate do not want another election, will call their bluff.

    Come friday for the vote suddenly around 20 MP's will be absent for the vote. The Conservative stimulus report will pass.

    Otherwise going to an election = Conservative Majority.

    That's the nature of a minority Conservative government pending major gaffs. None yet.

  12. by ridenrain
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:21 pm
    CTV nailed it:

    CTV Anchor: "What did you make of that Press conference Tom? What did you make of what Mr. Ignatieff had to say?"

    Tom Clark: "I think that Michael Ignatieff took a big stick and he drew a line in the sand... and then he took that stick and erased parts of the line big enough that you could drive a Prime Ministerial limousine through Dan... I... ah, there's not gonna be an election outta this."


    Sounds like Harper blew off the professor's questions and the balls back in the Liberal court again. That would make this some 44 or 45 abstentions? The record keeps getting better and better but no reporter will even touch it.

  13. by avatar bootlegga
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:28 pm
    "Canadaka" said

    There would of course be partisan games from all sides, but it would be less than it has been. I don't see how it could be worse.


    Yeah, it's been pretty brutal for the past five or six years that's for sure. Supporting your party is fine, but this over-the-top partisanship (by both sides) has to end so some real work can get done.

  14. by avatar EyeBrock
    Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:29 pm
    Go for it Iggy. I double dare ya! A minority Lib government would be fun!



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • DerbyX Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:22 am
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net