news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

No jail argued for child porn accused

Canadian Content
20814news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

No jail argued for child porn accused


Law & Order | 208107 hits | Oct 28 8:51 am | Posted by: WDHIII
22 Comment

EDMONTON -- A man who distributed child porn by posting naked photos of his underage girlfriend online after being dumped shouldn't get a mandatory minimum one-year jail term.

Comments

  1. by roger-roger
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:42 pm
    Screw him, he deserves 18 months for what he did.

  2. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:39 pm
    "Eisensapper" said
    Screw him, he deserves 18 months for what he did.


    Jail time, yes. Child porn? No. It was consentual. Posting it on the web, was reprehensible though, I just don't think it was a crime.

  3. by avatar Robair
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:30 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    Screw him, he deserves 18 months for what he did.


    Jail time, yes. Child porn? No. It was consentual. Posting it on the web, was reprehensible though, I just don't think it was a crime.If a 20 year old man did that to your 16 year old daughter you would.

  4. by avatar Robair
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:36 pm
    In case my last post was a little ambiguous, I'll clear up the fact that I fully support the child porn charge. He distributed pornography containing someone he knew was a minor. What part of that doesn't fit the charge??

  5. by roger-roger
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:46 pm
    Even if the minimum was 6 months the garbage should get 1 year.

  6. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:09 pm
    Yeah I'm sorry, but even though it was consentual, this guy kenw what he was doing and posted pictures online. At least oen eyar of jail would be good.

  7. by roger-roger
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:16 pm
    Lets not forget, they guy was 20 years old and dating a minor!

  8. by avatar DrCaleb
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:23 pm
    "Robair" said
    Screw him, he deserves 18 months for what he did.


    Jail time, yes. Child porn? No. It was consentual. Posting it on the web, was reprehensible though, I just don't think it was a crime.If a 20 year old man did that to your 16 year old daughter you would.

    Nope. The girl I married was younger than that when we started going out (but I was younger than 20). I cannot be a hypocrite. 14 was the age of consent at the time we were going out.

    But I had the decency to never consider doing something like that. And I still have some pics of my ex, at that age. She let me take the pictures consensually, trusting no one would ever see them but me. (I developed the film and the photos)

    If some bastard and stalked my daughter, I would support the full weight of the law be thrown at him. If he posted those pics, there wouldn't be much left to go to trial. But I don't agree that it's child porn. That is in a whole category by itself, reserved for the sickest among society.

  9. by roger-roger
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:29 pm
    They were sexual pictures, which makes them porn + minor = Child Porn.

  10. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:32 pm
    Ages and consent aside. This asswipe should get at least one year for stupidity.

  11. by avatar Robair
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:35 pm
    "DrCaleb" said
    But I don't agree that it's child porn. That is in a whole category by itself, reserved for the sickest among society.
    Think of the precedent you're setting there. It's okay to exploit girls under 18 years of age on your website if you talked them into dating you first?

    18 years old, pretty cut and dry.

  12. by avatar mixedfarmer
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:51 pm
    he should get 25 years min with an option to keep him another 25 years

  13. by roger-roger
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:54 pm
    Were they pictures of you farmer? you dirty girl :wink:

  14. by avatar mixedfarmer
    Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:54 pm
    sorry didnt see he was 20 years old well he should get 18 months



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:58 am
  • kitty Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:01 am
  • Eisensapper Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:43 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net