news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canada to widen Arctic patrols, PM says

Canadian Content
20837news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canada to widen Arctic patrols, PM says


Misc CDN | 208371 hits | Aug 27 7:00 pm | Posted by: Hyack
8 Comment

TUKTOYAKTUK � Canada is expanding by half a million square kilometres the amount of Arctic Ocean it will consider to be Canadian territory for the purpose of policing pollution violations, and will make it mandatory for all ships entering its polar waters

Comments

  1. by avatar tritium
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:44 am
    WOOOT!! Regina, can't bitch at me alone anymore. ROTFL

    http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=36223

    viewtopic.php?t=67128

  2. by avatar Hyack
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:24 am
    I really hate to burst your bubble trit, but, while the two stories are similar, the main topic is different enough for both stories to be posted. You can say the second one was a follow up, expanding what was stated in the first.

  3. by avatar Tman1
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:11 am
    Didn't Harper just say they were going to cut the new navy patrol ships?

  4. by avatar Hyack
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:36 am
    Yep,It canceled a tender call for the purchase of 12 mid-shore patrol ships for the coast guard and scuttled the navy's project to replace its aging supply ships, saying bids from the shipbuilding industry were higher than the money set aside for the program.

  5. by avatar Tman1
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:51 am
    I don't understand. The article implies that Canada is widening its arctic sovereignty but at the same time cancels out of new patrol ships...so basically it's Canada's talk the talk but can't walk the walk routine... really now. :roll:

  6. by avatar Hyack
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:02 am
    The mid-shore patrol vessels were to be used primarily for fisheries conservation and protection duties in the Maritime, Quebec and Pacific regions. So far I as know plans are still on for up to eight Polar Class 5 Arctic Offshore Patrol Ships.

    The new Polar Class 5 Arctic offshore patrol ships will be able to patrol the length of the Northwest Passage during the summer navigable season and its approaches year-round, and will also be capable of full operations on the East and West Coasts throughout the year.

    They will be custom-designed and built in Canada, and will be among the heaviest, most versatile armed naval vessels capable of sustained operations in ice.

    With steel-reinforced hulls, they will be capable of operating in ice up to one meter (39 inches) thick, and each vessel will be equipped with a helicopter landing pad.

  7. by avatar Tman1
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:23 am
    That's if the Cons are elected in this so called 'upcoming' election. Those could very well be scrapped as well.

  8. by avatar bootlegga
    Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:10 pm
    Once again, I ask, how are we going to do this? Hope a Ranger can pull over a US icebreaker on his skidoo? Despite all of Harper big talk, they still haven't done anything in the Arctic, other than hide there during the AIDS conference.

    No contracts for bases, icebreakers, or anything else so far. At the rate Harper's going, he'll wind up just like Mulroney, lots of hot air promises and nothing to show for it.

    For all his talk of 'Canada First', his cancellation of the mid-shore vessels speaks volumes. Surpluses go to taxcuts not the military. Then again, he's a politician, so I shouldn't be surprised he lied about his defence spending promises...



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • tritium Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:50 pm
  • TonyCanuck Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:04 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net