 Manitoba Child and Family services was in court Monday to argue for permanent guardianship of a girl and boy, after the girl was sent to school sporting a swastika -- a symbol typically associated with racially-motivated hate groups. Comments
view comments in forum You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.
|
|
She should take them to the HRC, they would entertain this and make the school pay.
The swastika is a symbol of hate, not only that she is wearing a symbol that 53000 Canadians gave their life to eradacate.
She should take them to the HRC, they would entertain this and make the school pay.
The swastika is a symbol of hate, not only that she is wearing a symbol that 53000 Canadians gave their life to eradacate.
No i'm making a point about the HRC.
Although, this might have gone a little too far, I admit. Still, taking the kids out of the home is a little extreme.
Instead, Child and Family services should look at abusive homes where children are mistreated, rather than trying to play the too ''politically correct'' game.
Those kids were never abused, hit or bruised. They were fed properly. Could go on, but you get the point.
Although, this might have gone a little too far, I admit. Still, taking the kids out of the home is a little extreme.
Instead, Child and Family services should look at abusive homes where children are mistreated, rather than trying to play the too ''politically correct'' game.
Geeez, that is abuse. Psychological and mental abuse.
Her actions go too far imo, but still... I think taking the kids away goes kinda far too... And I hate to say it
Those kids were never abused, hit or bruised. They were fed properly. Could go on, but you get the point.
Although, this might have gone a little too far, I admit. Still, taking the kids out of the home is a little extreme.
Instead, Child and Family services should look at abusive homes where children are mistreated, rather than trying to play the too ''politically correct'' game.
Geeez, that is abuse. Psychological and mental abuse.
Why? Is your way of thinking the only correct one?
She can draw butterflies on her arm (cuz that is cute), but not Swastika's? Then it is abuse? You could see it as freedom of opinion...
Everybody raises his kids differently, and your way of raising them might not be exactly like hers (I hope) but does it make her way wrong?
Those kids were never abused, hit or bruised. They were fed properly. Could go on, but you get the point.
Although, this might have gone a little too far, I admit. Still, taking the kids out of the home is a little extreme.
Instead, Child and Family services should look at abusive homes where children are mistreated, rather than trying to play the too ''politically correct'' game.
Geeez, that is abuse. Psychological and mental abuse.
But what�s next?
"My daddy said that gay people are freaks in our society"
"My religion says that abortion is wrong"
"My religion says that I can't speak with Jews, they are unclean people"
I agree with Pimp, physical abuse is one thing. but when the state tells you what you can/cannot teach your kids that crosses the line.
There are far worst cases that are never investigated. For instance, some kids are malnourished, kicked and abused. But this particual parent actually cared for her children. As long as she did not force it upon her daughter, then it is not abuse.
Again, it's too easy to pick on an obvious case like this, since it is a white family. Political correctness and media friendly. And as quoted previously, Black Power is ok but White Pride isn't? Fair or not.
As much as it is not my way of raising my kids, I have to agree with her on this:
Her actions go too far imo, but still... I think taking the kids away goes kinda far too... And I hate to say it
i was about to post the same thing. you can have a gay pride parade in toronto with scantally clad men and women but you can't have a white pride parade because its racist.
if you go to the extreems in any situation of course its gonna be a bad thing. to me theres no difference is a white person hurting a black person simply based on skin colour or a black person hurting a hispanic person for the same damn reason,
and while I think writing these things on your child is wrong. i dont believe theres a damn thing wrong with teaching your child to stand up and be proud of who they are even if that means standing up and saying I'm proud to be white.
saying this is wrong makes you no beter than everyone else. its just another form of being racist.
Problem being you can be proud to be white and not hold any hatred for other races but still get the same label if you say so.