EyeBrock EyeBrock:
With the recent SCC Vs McNeil decision, this cop’s misconduct will be disclosed at every criminal trial he is a part of that involves any act of violence until he dies.
Well from reading the SCC decision and talking to some officers my understanding of what that ruling said and what each province is telling its forces to do in light of it vary from province to province.
The ruling said only information from the officer history that is related and relevant to the case he is witness for. So technically if this office was in court for a fraud case this abuse issue should not be released to the defense.
That said I know Sask and BC are doing like you mentioned and going a step further, just releasing everything under the worry ot the crown not releasing the right information to the court since it is up to the crown to release this info.
Officer get stupid spiteful complaints and sadly with the provinces taking the release all info stance rather than the "lets think about this" stance every stupid complaint by guys pissed just because they were caught will be open for scrutiny.
More on par with this case however, this does not sound like a frivolous complaint so he's got to live with it.
It's understandable some would feel he deserves it but our officer have to be held to a higher standard, I'm sure they all agree he deserves a whack up side the head like his parents should have given him years ago but their professional exercising of restraint by not acting on those thoughts are what makes them good cops and earn public trust. Allowing this also leads to a slippery slope for escalation in how rough suspects are treated.