If Ford's telling the truth it's pretty telling that a country that pays it's auto workers 5 dollars an hour can't compete with a communist country when it comes to manufacturing. Here's what Ford said when they were going to move the plant to Mexico:
$1:
3. Lower wages: Ford's labor costs in Mexico have always been much lower than in the U.S.
U.S. autoworkers made, on average, just under $30 per hour compared with just more than $5 per hour in 2014, according to Kristin Dziczek, director of the labor and industry group at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor.
In November, the UAW pushed Ford as well as General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles to agree to essentially eliminate an entry-level wage structure put in place in 2007 that lowered the automaker's U.S. labor costs and led to the addition of thousands of jobs in the U.S.
Over time, all of Ford's entry-level workers in the U.S. will see their wages increase to about $29 per hour. While the UAW has touted the raises as a huge win for U.S. workers, it also widens the labor cost gap with Mexico.
Hinrichs declined to comment directly on the impact of that new contract when he spoke with the Free Press on Tuesday but did acknowledge that "labor costs" were among the factors.
http://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/f ... /82693218/So why the sudden change by Ford because I can't see a Chinese auto worker being paid less than a Mexican one. So is this just political posturing by Ford because if it is, it just might come back and bite them in the ass especially if they have a tariff slapped on their cars and, when you combine that with the increased shipping costs it's going to make selling the focus in America pretty much a non starter which means they just cut out the worlds larges market. So is it a case of cutting off their nose to spite their face?
Oh wait Chinese auto workers don't make less money than their Mexican counterparts so this move is likely motivated more by politics than greed.
http://topforeignstocks.com/2017/05/10/ ... -in-china/