CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:03 pm
 


BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's not like you guys has to endure actual racism like being systematically persecuted and denied basic rights for hundreds of years.


Given that statement I'm going to assume you aren't Irish Catholic. ROTFL


Wait Irish Catholics...are those the guys who ALSO formed armed militant groups to fight persecution?
Militant groups who, unlike the Black Panthers, actually targeted civilians in terrorist attacks yet, DON't seem to attract the unbridled rage of White people for some totally mysterious and non-obvious reason?

Militant groups who everyone with at least 5% Irish ancestry brags about knowing a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who was member?

Militant groups whose anthems get sung every St. Patty's day at every local Irish pub by Irish and "Irish-for-day" alike?

Those guys?


Yup those guys.


Blacks protested and armed themselves, the Native Indians protest and armed themselves, the Irish armed themselves. Hell pretty much anyone who was a conquered people armed themselves at one point or another in their history but with that aside WTF does any of that have to do with your theory that only people of colour experience racism?


And here's another question. Since you know absolutely nothing about anyone on these forums other than what you read, why is it that you automatically assume that anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view on racism is "white"?

That assumption is racist. As for your claim about WASPS being perpetually outraged. Well after reading your posts on the topic I'm going to go out on a limb here and say. Actually you're the one who's being perpetually outraged and it would appear to be caused by the mere thought that anyone could disagree with your point of view on racism.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:14 pm
 


He's offended for minorities even when they find no offense. It's the soft core racism of the white left wing. Only they can be the arbiters of what is offensive....because they truly believe they are the only ones correctly indoctrinatededucated.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:46 pm
 


ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
Only they can be the arbiters of what is offensive....because they truly believe they are the only ones correctly indoctrinatededucated.

Isn't that exactly the position of the righties on this thread? Only they get to decide what's offensive?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 318
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:57 pm
 


I hate the word "indoctrination".

It's really just a pseudo-intellectual word the people use to describe anything that they disagree with.

If you call someone "indoctrinated" then you are basically saying "You are an idiot with no critical thinking skills."


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 8:19 pm
 


Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
WTF does any of that have to do with your theory that only people of colour experience racism?


Well it's about disenfranchisement which is not commonly forced on th white race. Maybe in Zimbabwe but I can't think of anywhere else. I'll answer the complaint about Blacks being racist to whites with a snippet from an article about a similar argument how women are sexist to men. Just substitute the word "race" for "gender", "men" for the word "white" and "women" for "black". You get the idea.


$1:
Why People Being Shitty to You Is Not the Same as You Being Systematically Disenfranchised

There might be a lot of women in your life who are mean to you, but that's just women not liking you personally. Women are allowed to not like you personally, just like you are allowed to not like us personally. It's not misandry, it's mis-Kevin-dry. Or, you know, whoever you are. It is not built into our culture or codified into law, and you can rest assured that most women you encounter are not harboring secret, latent, gendered prejudices against Kevins that could cost you a job or an apartment or your physical sanctity. That doesn't mean that there aren't isolated incidents wherein mean women hurt men on purpose. But it is not a systemic problem that results in the mass disenfranchisement of men.

There are some really shitty things about being a man. You are 100% right on that. You are held up to unreasonable expectations about your body and your career and your ability/desire to conform to traditional modes of masculinity (just like women are with traditional femininity), and that is absolutely oppressive. There are radical feminists and deeply wounded women and women who just don't have the patience for diplomacy anymore who absolutely hate you because of your gender. (However, for whatever it's worth, I do not personally know a single woman like that.) That is an unpleasant situation to be in—especially when you also feel like you're being blamed for the seemingly distant problems of people you've never met and towards whom you feel no particular animus.

The difference is, though, that the radfem community on Tumblr does not currently hold the reins of power in every country on earth (even in nations with female heads of state, the political and economic power structures are still dominated by men). You do, abstractly. No, you don't have the ability or the responsibility to fix those imbalances single-handedly, but refusing to acknowledge that power structure is a slap in the face to people actively disadvantaged by it every day of their lives. You might not benefit from patriarchy in any measurable way—on an individual level your life might actually be much, much worse than mine—but the fact is that certain disadvantages are absent from your experience (and, likely, invisible to you) because of your gender.

Maybe you're saying, "Hey, but my life wasn't fair either. I've had to struggle." I know it wasn't. I know you have. But that's not how fairness works. If you present fairness as the goal—that some day everything will be "fair" for everyone—you're slipping into an unrealistic fantasy land. Life already isn't fair, because of coincidence and circumstance and the DNA you were born with, and we all have to accept the hands we're dealt and live within that reality. But life doesn't have to be additionally unfair because of imposed systems of disenfranchisement that only affect certain groups. We can fight against that.


http://jezebel.com/5992479/if-i-admit-t ... g-prophecy

FOG FOG:
And here's another question. Since you know absolutely nothing about anyone on these forums other than what you read, why is it that you automatically assume that anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view on racism is "white"? That assumption is racist.
. Oh spare me. I don't know that you're white but supporting the confederate flag while clutching your pearls over a dance number with references to Black Panthers is a pretty good clue where your priorities are.

$1:
As for your claim about WASPS being perpetually outraged. Well after reading your posts on the topic I'm going to go out on a limb here and say. Actually you're the one who's being perpetually outraged and it would appear to be caused by the mere thought that anyone could disagree with your point of view on racism.


I'm not outraged. I didn't start this thread, your rightie friends did. And you can't take umbrage over the fact that I dared to debate the topic. I'm mocking the right wing outrage, most of which is just cynical political theatre by the Republicans and Fox News types.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:38 am
 


A spirited response from a feminist blog that still didn't answer my question.

Why do you think people of colour are the only people who experience racism and please spare me the disenfranchisement and gender specific arguments since they really don't have a bearing on the answer? My argument was about your perception that whites were incapable of being victims of racism, nothing more.

But, as for my priorities let's discuss them.

I'd hazard a guess that you have zero idea about what they really are because if you had, you'd understand why I defended peoples rights to fly Lee's Battle Flag over the perpetually butt hurt who seem to think anything and everything is a slight against their or someone else's, race, creed, colour, religion or other sundry beliefs.


Banning a flag like most other things championed by the left won't stop racism and it won't change history no matter how many times you people click your heels together. So, despite all the analysing, guessing and suppositions, you really have no idea about why people like me have taken a stand against the failed, bigoted, self flagellating, anti white apologist approach to race relations that are currently being promoted as mainstream.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:14 am
 


BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Well it's about disenfranchisement which is not commonly forced on th white race. Maybe in Zimbabwe but I can't think of anywhere else.

Caribbean. Take a trip, FOG, to Bahamas or Jamaica some time and go for a walk off the resort. It's a real eye-opener for whites. Then you'll have a sense for what African-Americans experience every day.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53267
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:31 am
 


Lemmy Lemmy:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Well it's about disenfranchisement which is not commonly forced on th white race. Maybe in Zimbabwe but I can't think of anywhere else.

Caribbean. Take a trip, FOG {BF}, to Bahamas or Jamaica some time and go for a walk off the resort. It's a real eye-opener for whites. Then you'll have a sense for what African-Americans experience every day.


^^ This. My sister worked for years in the Cayman Islands. She found blacks to be so openly racist toward whites, that she likened it to the reverse KKK. Blacks anywhere else would not have tolerated the treatment shown toward anyone not 'black enough', and especially the melanin challenged.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 955
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:51 am
 


Thanos Thanos:
Tommy Sotomayor also calls out the community on a regular basis for their incessant low-life bullshit routine with a persistent "they think we're all idiots because we keep acting like idiots" truth-to-power commentary. Good stuff and the black political establishment/liberal white-guilt industry also absolutely hates him for it. Here's his YouTube channel for anyone interested.

https://www.youtube.com/user/tnnraw2


Isn't this him supporting Beyonce? I'm not sure from your post if this was expected or not.

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Thanos Thanos:
I hate football anyway so I really don't care. I only figured that the Super Bowl in San Francisco is one of the few places in the US where a billionaire black female singer can get away no problem with a death-to-the-cops halftime show. :lol:


One of the talk show hosts down here commented that Beyonce hates the cops unless they're escorting her Cadillac.


I only really saw commentary pointed at abuse of police power (particularly in shooting incidents) and law enforcement reactions following disasters following Hurricane Katrina when it comes to "hatred" of cops.

Most of the rest comes from a fairly singular and extreme analysis of the black panther uniforms, and frankly I figure when in context with the lyrics of formation it's more about brotherhood in face of adversity above anything else, and against corruption in how laws are enforced as a second. I doubt Beyonce is cheering on people to kill cops.

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Image


It's already bad enough and classless enough that you want to make fun of someone (particularly when reducing a women to) their looks, it's probably even worse when she is objectively better looking (not to mention more successful) than probably everyone who uses this board so it falls flat to boot.

BRAH BRAH:
Beyonce is a Hypocritical Phony Black Activist C***!


Deep.

... I'm kind of hoping "black activist" is a descriptor and not meant to be as insulting as the other three descriptors.

Jin-Gitaxias Jin-Gitaxias:


Preach.

Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's not like you guys has to endure actual racism like being systematically persecuted and denied basic rights for hundreds of years.


Given that statement I'm going to assume you aren't Irish Catholic. ROTFL


If it's been perpetuated for the Irish then it's been perpetuated for African Americans to a greater extent, which I think is a more pointed way of describing it than how BeaverFever did.

After all, one group has a rather bleak history in the Americas, beginning with slavery on plantations, moving through disenfranchisement, into being pushed into ghettos and "separate but equal" lifestyles, and in a generation or two after all these issues (and, let's face it, some oddly racist hold outs about inter-racial marriages in a lot of the States) now face a lot of ongoing demographic problems. I think it's hard to say it's all perpetuated by members of that minority community and that their recent history, hardships and issues don't play a role as well.

A song which commemorates a lot of those recent moments (NOLA, MLK, spate of shootings) is highlighting an issue that already exists in my view. I'm sure some white people suffer (I do, but beating up a gay is probably a bit different), but there is some fairly clear problems down in the States that supercede the racial issues White people face by a fair degree.

The Irish struggles, while no doubt unique and important, are not the same, nor in my view, as pervasive as the struggles black people have faced in America, especially when considering the scope of the struggle of African Americans.

In my view anyway. After all, I grew up in a less than stellar place but it wasn't the projects, a ghetto, or something similar.

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:


Already in the news, already a tragedy, but also already common. Violence both by cops and against cops need to be discussed. One doesn't minimize the other, however. This isn't "us versus him" or "blue versus black." It's literally "holy fuck that is a lot of corpses."

So far, I haven't seen a single article that has managed to correlate the link any more than "Beyonce sung a song and a cop died." When a culprit says he did it because of Beyonce, then I'll buy it.

GreenTiger GreenTiger:
Morgan Freeman has the best answer to all of this racial Horse Shit.


https://youtu.be/FRnTovm26I4


It's kind of funny, because he has a point, in-so-far as if we didn't look at race the police shootings each year would still be considered important, and we'd be viewing it in a very different lens. Yet, because we look at race, it's passed off as "black culture issues" or is treated as a racial issue (with all the charged language thereof) instead of as a real civil issue. It's why I was so impressed when Rand Paul pointed out during a debate how bad it was that places like Ferguson promote fees and such on their mostly black communities as a way to maintain income, because he was talking about changing a civic issue by actually talking about the civic issue.

Likewise, Freeman doesn't view MLK as a black hero because it "dilutes" his impact. He should be an American hero, not a black hero, because it dilutes his impact and limits that identity to on a minority of people.

He talks about that, and why race is still very much an issue here. He even points to Obama's identity as black mattering here, where he views black people as the underside of America and groups like the Tea Party driving it. I'd like to see more than a minute snapshot of that interview, to be honest. It seems his stance is a little more nuanced than talking around race.

He wants people to stop talking about it, but (and from here on in it's my own opinion, not Freeman's) it's only been a generation or two since "separate but equal." Many are alive who remember it, and many more grew up in situations that are it's offspring, like the projects. These issues need to be talked about in any context. It's also a question of those being black not being considered the same Americans as those who are white for these people. Beyonce is more or less condemning the fact that it seems like it is talked about it in that context in negative ways, and promotes social action to counteract it.

stratos stratos:
$1:
It's not like you guys has to endure actual racism like being systematically persecuted and denied basic rights for hundreds of years.


Nor has anyone alive today. If you can find someone who has been systematically persecuted and denied basic rights along with actual racism for hundreds of years please point this person out.

Because if you want to claim this is suppressed rage for action done in the past. I will gladly go along with that if you allow my 2000+ years of suppressed rage for the actions of the Carthaginians against my ancestors to also be valid.

Any and all grievances leveled against my ... wait none of my ancestors as far as can be determined had slaves. Okay lets see... denied basic human rights I did not deny anyone such things nor anyone in the determination of my family's background. Admittedly we had some smugglers and poachers in our history so you may have a very weak case there at best. Racism.. well not on my part as best as I can tell, this is hard to be claimed against my ancestors for the factors all ready mentioned.


What I am very much in favor of ending racist terms such as Afro-American, Asian-American and such other hyphenated usage. American works perfectly for every single citizen. By adding anything prior to American you are distinguishing yourself apart from the rest. This is a form of racism by promoting said race apart and or above from the rest of the citizenship. I also consider stating that current members of any race are liable and accountable for actions done by pervious members of their race in the past is a form of racism.

So basically it comes down to holding people accountable for their own words and actions. Abhorrence to racism being countered by saying someone is hypocritical for their reaction is latent support of racism.


I think there's a fairly obvious distinction between "the vestiges of it's impact are so recent my Grandma talks about using different entrances so as not to get the hose, and I live in the housing complex they built to keep us in a ghetto back then still" to 2000 years prior.

We don't question the role the holocaust has played in the Israel identity, nor do I think we question the abuse they faced for the few hundred years previous. That said, Jewish identity is not formed by the decisions of Kings centuries past to throw them out of their realms, nor do the Jewish people expect recompense from the decedents of the Galicians or the Vikings who no doubt attacked some Jewish settlements on their way to sack the rest of the known world.

In short, it matters because there are those still alive who faced that oppression, grew up knowing it and living it and learning of how it was even worse from those before. It matters also because the divide still exists in some form (this thread and the various criticisms and support for Beyonce around the US and the world clearly demonstrate that) to this date, and seems to be persisting to the next generation.

That those dynamics are still playing out today means this isn't about "your ancestors owning slaves," it's about fellow Americans facing struggles because the system still is in some ways stack against them and a more powerful people who have a past which did benefit of this divide claiming that because they didn't personally involve themselves in it, they don't need to deal with this ongoing issue.

As an aside, I know my family (who, as mostly rural blue collar folk, didn't have much), who didn't own slaves, probably had benefits and advantages because we were white going back generations to when we were buying sugar and cotton all the way through to competing for jobs in the twenties and that the structural support we have goes back generations, support many people otherwise don't have.

It's not "guilt" for me to recognize it, nor is it guilt for me to recognize I probably benefitted from it tangentially. For the record, my mostly rural blue collar ancestry would probably have liked the same sort of discussion black people want now, dealing with entitled and powerful elites who lived in the cities. From the looks of Trump and Sanders and their narratives of taking back the system, it's a discussion they continue to want today. I'm not surprised that the black community is all on board with that bandwagon.

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's not like you guys has to endure actual racism like being systematically persecuted and denied basic rights for hundreds of years.


You mean like the Jews?


I could probably make a point of the issues with those Jews of African ancestry and integrating into Israel, but I think something more poignant would be a reminder of the clash between the Ashkenazim (German, East European, liberalism) and the Sephardim (Spanish, Middle Eastern, orthodoxy), and how this separation continues to define politics to this day in Israel.

That a split could exist of mention worthy of Beyonce's song in North America given the history (her song deals with mostly recent history at that) of black and white interaction isn't such a surprise when such tensions even run deep between peoples both troubled by the same oppression.

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

Being born in England does that mean I should call myself Anglo-Canadian?

I take pride in my English culture without having to resort to the hyphenated crap.

I also take pride in the fact that I call myself Canadian. I think your point is moot.


Not to put too fine a point on it, but being an anglo-Canadian or a Franco-Canadian is already a thing here (I'm pretty sure I read at least one of those words a few times a week). The only difference is we don't always need to hyphenate when we reduce our French community to pretty much complaining about Quebec, and there's no hyphen in the province name. :lol:

We talk about French problems all the time on this forum. It's hyphenation-lite.

stratos stratos:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
stratos stratos:

Nor has anyone alive today. If you can find someone who has been systematically persecuted and denied basic rights along with actual racism for hundreds of years please point this person out.

Because if you want to claim this is suppressed rage for action done in the past. I will gladly go along with that if you allow my 2000+ years of suppressed rage for the actions of the Carthaginians against my ancestors to also be valid.

Any and all grievances leveled against my ... wait none of my ancestors as far as can be determined had slaves. Okay lets see... denied basic human rights I did not deny anyone such things nor anyone in the determination of my family's background. Admittedly we had some smugglers and poachers in our history so you may have a very weak case there at best. Racism.. well not on my part as best as I can tell, this is hard to be claimed against my ancestors for the factors all ready mentioned.


What I am very much in favor of ending racist terms such as Afro-American, Asian-American and such other hyphenated usage. American works perfectly for every single citizen. By adding anything prior to American you are distinguishing yourself apart from the rest. This is a form of racism by promoting said race apart and or above from the rest of the citizenship. I also consider stating that current members of any race are liable and accountable for actions done by pervious members of their race in the past is a form of racism.

So basically it comes down to holding people accountable for their own words and actions. Abhorrence to racism being countered by saying someone is hypocritical for their reaction is latent support of racism.



Can you please clarify exactly what year racism ended in America?


once you show me someone who has "endure actual racism like being systematically persecuted and denied basic rights for hundreds of years. " walking around the US today.

I'll also point out I've never said it died out or has stopped. What I'm saying is that there is 1) A history of white's being enslaved, discriminated against and denied human rights. That most want to ignore and or deny 2)that claiming whites are not discriminated against even today is a lie and that we have as much right to be offended as any other race 3) that a lot of this racism junk can go away here in America when we quit talking about ourselves and others under terms such as Afro-American, Asian-American and so forth and just consider all citizens as Americans.


If you accept that, then you have to accept issues black people face are very real. Again, it's not an "us versus them" problem. Point to white people being oppressed and we'll work to fix it just as much as we should work to fix issues facing the black community.

Funny thing is, talking about it or not, we'd have to do a lot of stuff that the community needs done. Beyonce is highlighting that it's not happening, and it's not happening along racial lines, so clearly there is still an issue of race there (in her view). The "colour blind" people should be just as on board with correcting these issues as Beyonce is.

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
He's offended for minorities even when they find no offense. It's the soft core racism of the white left wing. Only they can be the arbiters of what is offensive....because they truly believe they are the only ones correctly indoctrinatededucated.


Come on Shep, this thread is literally "people are offended because Beyonce wrote a song about being offended as a representative of a community who probably has reasons to be offended but do so in a way that offends others for potentially offensive reasons." No one is the arbiter of everything here because everyone has representatives of their political leanings who are offended on their behalf.

Seriously. This entire debate has had offended people from the crazy gutters of the political spectrum all the way to the centrist-left and centrist-right people. It's an offense palooza. Offense for all. All offend. Rah rah rah, and so forth.

BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
WTF does any of that have to do with your theory that only people of colour experience racism?


Well it's about disenfranchisement which is not commonly forced on th white race. Maybe in Zimbabwe but I can't think of anywhere else. I'll answer the complaint about Blacks being racist to whites with a snippet from an article about a similar argument how women are sexist to men. Just substitute the word "race" for "gender", "men" for the word "white" and "women" for "black". You get the idea.


EDIT: Okay, the Carribean point has been discussed, but I have another set of examples.

Any example of intersectionality, Israel and the Jewish diaspora, and other WW2-esque examples spring to mind as examples. Like I said above, though, I don't view the existence of disadvantaged white people to in any way minimize the existence of disadvantaged black people, nor do I think we can effectively compare any minority groups against each other on some "suffering meter" so I kind of find most of this topic about "but what about other groups" to not really matter with regards to Beyonce.

Any suffering by a human being is something we should consider rectifying, and the fact that the black community has a prominent recent history of significant suffering that probably impacts them to this date is something we can't afford to forget.


Last edited by Khar on Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:02 am, edited 3 times in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:58 am
 


Good post, Khar. [B-o]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
^^ This. My sister worked for years in the Cayman Islands. She found blacks to be so openly racist toward whites, that she likened it to the reverse KKK. Blacks anywhere else would not have tolerated the treatment shown toward anyone not 'black enough', and especially the melanin challenged.

Well first, though I quoted Beave, my comment was certainly directed at FOG. As a white spouse of a black woman and father of 3 half-black children, I think maybe my perspective is slightly different from most. And, growing up in white-bread rural Ontario, I shared some of FOG's sentiments before my perspective was altered by living with my wife and kids and sharing their experiences. It's one of those things, I suggest, that you can't understand until you walk a mile in the other guy's shoes (or at least hold hands with someone walking in those shoes). So, FOG, and no offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. Neither did I for a long time (and maybe I still don't fully).


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Dallas Stars


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 18770
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 8:41 am
 


$1:
Point to white people being oppressed and we'll work to fix it just as much as we should work to fix issues facing the black community.


Many law enforcement, Fire departments and other governmental test's have a scaled passing score. Generally starting around 75% gets a pass if you are Black or Hispanic while Whites must score 100% some times 110% (You gain 10% for prior military service.) Many Universities and Collages maintain a quota type system that forces them to allow 2.7 GPA black students into Law School while having to deny a 3.1 GPA White student.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:11 am
 


stratos stratos:
Many law enforcement, Fire departments and other governmental test's have a scaled passing score. Generally starting around 75% gets a pass if you are Black or Hispanic while Whites must score 100% some times 110% (You gain 10% for prior military service.) Many Universities and Collages maintain a quota type system that forces them to allow 2.7 GPA black students into Law School while having to deny a 3.1 GPA White student.

And you equate that to "oppression"?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4814
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:11 am
 


What a racist bitch, if she was in Washington they would've tomahawk chopped her ass right out of the stadium.


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
Profile
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 2:38 pm
 


Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
.... as for my priorities let's discuss them. I'd hazard a guess that you have zero idea, etc ....
Your hazarded guess about someone else's "idea" has nothing to do with discussing your priorities. Flying that honoured flag you should have a better command of the English language and its legitimate use.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:54 pm
 


Lemmy Lemmy:
Good post, Khar. [B-o]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
^^ This. My sister worked for years in the Cayman Islands. She found blacks to be so openly racist toward whites, that she likened it to the reverse KKK. Blacks anywhere else would not have tolerated the treatment shown toward anyone not 'black enough', and especially the melanin challenged.

Well first, though I quoted Beave, my comment was certainly directed at FOG. As a white spouse of a black woman and father of 3 half-black children, I think maybe my perspective is slightly different from most. And, growing up in white-bread rural Ontario, I shared some of FOG's sentiments before my perspective was altered by living with my wife and kids and sharing their experiences. It's one of those things, I suggest, that you can't understand until you walk a mile in the other guy's shoes (or at least hold hands with someone walking in those shoes). So, FOG, and no offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. Neither did I for a long time (and maybe I still don't fully).


No offense taken but, I have experienced open racism towards whites and while I may not be able to share your collective experiences my perceptions are based on that fact.

So, I may not know what I'm talking about when it comes to you and your families experiences or any other coloured peoples for that matter but, I do know what I'm talking about when I say that I experienced racism based on my skin colour which would seem to indicate that anyone can be a victim of racism and it isn't the exclusive domain of one or a few groups of races.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.