desertdude desertdude:
Somebody add a Allahu Akbar in these two threads to get them going. 30 dead and 50 injured and barely even 4 pages combined.
So what's your point then? Sounds like you're saying people only respond to what look like they might turn out to be terrorist threads if it looks like a Jihadi is the perp.
Let's check that out then.
Here's the one on the Sri Lanka attack by what turned out to be jihadists:
current-events-f59/sri-lanka-explosions-kill-at-least-207-t122842-105.htmlEight pages
Here's one from shortly before that where a white Australian shot up a Mosque. No Allahu Akbars spoken by the perp.:
current-events-f59/breaking-gunmen-attack-new-zealand-mosques-many-dead-t122675.htmlSixteen pages.
Here's one on what we thought was going to be terror related but motive was never resolved. The Notre Dame Arson. There was no talk of, as you say, "Allahu Akbar" that I remember.
twelve pages.
So if we're only interested in Allahu Akbar links why is the Allahu Akbar story the one that received the least attention? It had the most deaths.
Go ahead admit it. I won't think less of you. You're wrong.