No, you misunderstand. I can't speak for Brah, but I offered the example of Harry and son expediting the process in Nevada for the Chinese only to show you that's the way it's done in Nevada.
The specific allegation for Bundy's property involves other characters and other property. Read Dana's article above. She'll explain it better.
There was a notice up on the BLM site regarding Bundy's place and what was planned for it, but BLM pulled it and tried to disappear it down the memory hole. Didn't work.
Free Republic saved it. It's below. Scroll down to "Cattle Trespass Impacts"...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/ ... ts?page=99There's this under "Examples of Restoration Funding and Viability Impacted".
$1:
Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle.
Here's a link giving a vague idea what BLM means by "offsite mitigation" for those "NGOs" lucky enough to get in on the solar subsidy gravy train.
http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/ ... ct2012.pdf