Lemmy Lemmy:
It sounds to me like you're biased by your experience. I, on the other hand, have the perspective of an objective, third-party researcher. And you're right, teacher education programs are a joke. The training program doesn't have any impact on the realities of the job. You think police college teaches cadets anything about being a good cop?
Hell no, but I'm also talking about teaching. They said teaching was a joke.
Tricks Tricks:
Are we talking about academics or larger aspects of raising children?
All encompassing. Of course they play a large role in the academic world, but that's also one that a parent, if they could set aside the time, could fill.
$1:
I would suggest that education is an important aspect of a child's life, but only one of many.
Agreed.
$1:
Would an individual teacher be a "significant influence" on the raising of a child? Likely not, except in rare circumstances. But the cumulative value of a quality education is certainly significant, though also not close to being on-par with the influence of a parent, in most circumstances.
Then I'd say we agree. If a kid receives a good solid education, along with not having fuck hole parents they're gonna be (generally) a solid person.
I think what I (and possibly Brenda) were objecting to was Beaver's seeming claim that teachers are as responsible or more responsible for the raising of youth than the parents. That's at least how I read it. Me no rikey.