[EyeBrock]

sandorski sandorski:

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Here we go again. Now we've gone from 'carbon emissions' or 'carbon footprint' to the much more vague, 'human activity'.

The goal posts of proof move weekly. Climate change is real enough and there is geological proof that it's happened before, often.
What is difficult to prove is that human activity is worse than say a volcanic eruption and which one of the two is causing the damage?

Holy Strawman!

Fail.

Pathetic.

[sandorski]

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

sandorski sandorski:

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Here we go again. Now we've gone from 'carbon emissions' or 'carbon footprint' to the much more vague, 'human activity'.

The goal posts of proof move weekly. Climate change is real enough and there is geological proof that it's happened before, often.
What is difficult to prove is that human activity is worse than say a volcanic eruption and which one of the two is causing the damage?

Holy Strawman!

Fail.

Pathetic.

I agree your Strawmen are Pathetic.

"Carbon Emissions", "Carbon Footprint", "Human Activity" are not a progression of Terms and/or a "proof" of moving Goal Posts. I'm not even sure how one could make that argument and actually think it is an argument.

Again with the "Happened Before" Strawman. No one denies this, in fact it is key to understanding the causes and consequences of GW.

Two Strawmen of Pathetic Fail. Congrats.

[ShepherdsDog]

Flail

[N_Fiddledog]

Cartoons by Josh has some cute ones on the state of climate science today.

http://www.cartoonsbyjosh.com/

Here's a sample...