[Tricks]

bootlegga bootlegga:

hwacker hwacker:

bootlegga bootlegga:

The person who mentions Pickton and Bernardo makes a good point. Does he not deserve the same rights we afforded those bastards?

Nope they are just sick fucks, khdar gave up his privilege to be a Canadian when he took arms against one of our allies.

They should have shot him dead on the spot. If it was me he’d be fertilizer already.

If they had shot him, this discussion wouldn't be happening. It would have been easier for all of us, but they didn't shoot him.

As a Canadian citizen (maybe a tenuous one at best), he still deserves the same trial that those otehr sick fucks got. Otherwise, where do we draw the line? Only certain people get fair trials?

If that's your line of thinking, better hope you are never in the wrong place at the wrong time (like David Milgaard).

Enemy Combatant =/= Bernardo.

[Scape]

I agree with tricks. This is not a civil matter, he is a POW and most likely a murderer to boot. His own family has declared themselves to be our sworn enemy and anyone who does not bow before them and their view of god. There is no middle road here and his best hope is to be a prisoner swap but we all know the VIP's the enemy capture are killed and with them any hope of Kadrs redemption.

[bootlegga]

ridenrain ridenrain:

You dodge my point.
Our kinsmen are being killed but we're not demanding a Canadian civilian trial because this is a war zone in a foreign country.

His legitimate trial is proceeding and this is simply a desperate attempt by his defence lawyers to drag useful idiot Canadians into the mess. To start another trial in Canada would make the Air India trial look like judge Judy.

I didn't dodge your point. I said rather clearly what I supported.

If another Canadian is found fighting with the Taliban, then damn right he should be brought home and charged with murder (assuming he is captured a live). Imposing Canadian justice on Canadians is what I support. Afghanis fighting with the Taliban should be subject to Afghan law.

I agree that should Khadr be brought home, it could turn into a media circus. But try and argue that the Pickton and Bernardo trials weren't...

[CanAm1]

bootlegga bootlegga:

hwacker hwacker:

bootlegga bootlegga:

The person who mentions Pickton and Bernardo makes a good point. Does he not deserve the same rights we afforded those bastards?

Nope they are just sick fucks, khdar gave up his privilege to be a Canadian when he took arms against one of our allies.

They should have shot him dead on the spot. If it was me he’d be fertilizer already.

If they had shot him, this discussion wouldn't be happening. It would have been easier for all of us, but they didn't shoot him.

As a Canadian citizen (maybe a tenuous one at best), he still deserves the same trial that those otehr sick fucks got. Otherwise, where do we draw the line? Only certain people get fair trials?

If that's your line of thinking, better hope you are never in the wrong place at the wrong time (like David Milgaard).

Canadian courts have no jurisdiction, he wasn't captured in, nor was the crime committed in Canada. He is under US juridiction, like you would be for committing crimes in another country. Homolka and the other sicko committed their crimes in Canada. Had they done that in the US or Afghanistan then they would have been prosecuted in those countries.
Do the crime do the time. And the law has no juridiction here anyway. The Geneva Convention article 4 and 5 say all that needs to be said on this.

[herbie]

$1:

Canadian courts have no jurisdiction, he wasn't captured in, nor was the crime committed in Canada. He is under US juridiction, like you would be for committing crimes in another country.

The US claims jurisdiction for 'crimes' committed in the rest of the world?
Either send the kid here, and he'll be out in a couple years or try him in Afghanistan where the "crime" was committed.

[hwacker]

herbie herbie:

$1:

Canadian courts have no jurisdiction, he wasn't captured in, nor was the crime committed in Canada. He is under US juridiction, like you would be for committing crimes in another country.

The US claims jurisdiction for 'crimes' committed in the rest of the world?
Either send the kid here, and he'll be out in a couple years or try him in Afghanistan where the "crime" was committed.

Perfect, in Afghanistan he'll be dead before night if it takes that long. Oh BTW Canada doesn’t want this POS back

[CanAm1]

herbie herbie:

$1:

Canadian courts have no jurisdiction, he wasn't captured in, nor was the crime committed in Canada. He is under US juridiction, like you would be for committing crimes in another country.

The US claims jurisdiction for 'crimes' committed in the rest of the world?
Either send the kid here, and he'll be out in a couple years or try him in Afghanistan where the "crime" was committed.

No their claim is that he is a POW. And that gives them jurisdiction.
And sorry but who wants this messed up muzzie out in a few years.

[CanAm1]

lily lily:

$1:

No their claim is that he is a POW. And that gives them jurisdiction.

Then why the claims that the Geneva Convention don't apply?

The Geneva Convention only applies to Soldiers that fight for a nation and that are in uniform.